Encyclopedia
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
An encyclopedia (or encyclopædia, cyclopædia) is a collection (usually a book) of information about things humans know.
Contents |
[change] Word origin
The word "encyclopedia" is Latin and comes from Greek. The words "εγκύκλιος παιδεία", enkyklios paideia mean "in a circle of teaching". It is from "εγκύκλιος", in a circle from "κύκλος" circle and "παιδεία", meaning teaching.
The word "εγκύκλιος" can also mean "general": perhaps the people who made the Latin name "encyclopedia" did not understand the Greek word well. Perhaps the name should mean "general teaching". In Canada and the UK, and some other countries affected by the British Empire, encyclopedia is spelt mostly as "encyclopædia".
[change] History
People have made encyclopedias for hundreds of years, but the name "encyclopedia" is from the 16th century.
[change] Types of encyclopedias
There are different types of encyclopedia. Some are general and have pages on lots of topics. The English language Encyclopædia Britannica and German Brockhaus are general encyclopedias. Some are about specific topics. For example, there are encyclopedias of medicine or philosophy. There are also some encyclopedias that have lots of topics with one point of view or one cultural bias. The Great Soviet Encyclopedia is one of these.
Many dictionaries have a different sort of information as encyclopedias. Examples are the Dictionary of National Biography, the Dictionary of American Naval Fighting Ships, and Black's Law Dictionary.
There are two main ways of organizing encyclopedias: from A to Z (the alphabetical way) or by categories. Most encyclopedias go from A to Z.
There are also printed encyclopedias, and encyclopedias in the computer, such as Wikipedia, the largest computer encyclopedia.
[change] Encyclopedias
The largest encyclopedia is Wikipedia in English, which has more than 2 million articles now. The second largest, is the Encyclopaedia Britannica, which is the largest one that is printed. Stacy Schiff, a writer, says that Wikipedia is not as good as other encyclopedias because anyone can change it, so some people may write things that are wrong. Also, the way that Wikipedia works means that there is likely to be bias.[1] On the other hand, Tyler Cowen, an Economist, says that other non-fiction writing may also have the same problems.[2]
[change] References
- ↑ Schiff, Stacy. "Know It All", The New Yorker, 31 July 2006. Retrieved on 15 August 2008. “open editing invites abuse. Senators and congressmen have been caught tampering with their entries; the entire House of Representatives has been banned from Wikipedia several times.”
- ↑ Cowen, Tyler. "Cooked Books", The New Republic, 12 March 2008. Retrieved on 15 August 2008. “The sad truth is that "non-fiction" has been unreliable from the beginning, no matter how finely grained a section of human knowledge we wish to consider. For instance, in my own field, critics have tried to replicate the findings in academic journal articles by economists using the initial data sets. Usually, it is impossible to replicate the results of the article even half of the time. Note that the journals publishing these articles often use two or three referees--experts in the area--and typically they might accept only 10 percent of submitted papers.”
